monocytogenes to β-lactams and have demonstrated that two other TCSs, LiaSR and

VirRS, are also linked to this response [11]. The mechanisms of tolerance of L. monocytogenes to cell envelope-acting antimicrobial agents are much more poorly characterized than the mechanisms of innate resistance to cephalosporins. To date, only the alternative sigma factor SigB has been shown to determine the tolerance of L. monocytogenes to β-lactams [12]. It seems reasonable to assume that certain genes that are important GSK2118436 price for the survival and growth of bacteria in the presence of cell envelope-acting antibiotics are induced during treatment with these antimicrobial agents. Several studies have provided evidence to support this assumption in the case of L. monocytogenes. Stack et al. [13] showed that htrA, encoding an HtrA-like serine protease, is essential for the growth of L. monocytogenes in the presence of penicillin G, and that this gene is more efficiently transcribed when this β-lactam is present. Gottschalk et al. [8] demonstrated that the transcription of several cell wall-related genes (controlled by the CesRK two-component system) is induced by β-lactam and glycopeptide antibiotics. Three of these genes, lmo1416, lmo2210 and lmo2812, play a significant role in the survival of the bacterium in

the presence of cell wall-acting antibiotics. More recently, Nielsen et al. [11] showed the same relationship between the induction of expression and significance of lmo2442 and lmo2568 genes in the susceptibility of L. monocytogenes to the β-lactam Bucladesine price antibiotic cefuroxime. Fulvestrant purchase These observations prompted us to attempt

to identify L. monocytogenes genes induced in the presence of penicillin G, in order to learn more about mechanisms of tolerance to this class of antibiotic. For this purpose, a promoter-trap system based on a promoterless plasmid-borne copy of the hly gene encoding listeriolysin O (LLO) was employed. This system has been used previously to identify L. monocytogenes promoters that are either constitutive or specifically induced during in vivo infection [14]. In the course of this 5-FU study, ten penicillin-G inducible genes were identified. The upregulated expression of these genes under penicillin G pressure was verified by transcriptional analysis. Three of the identified genes, namely fri, phoP and axyR, were selected for further investigation. The fri gene encodes a non-heme, iron-binding ferritin-like protein (Fri) that belongs to the Dps (DNA-binding proteins from starved cells) family of proteins, which play important roles in the response to multiple stresses in many bacterial species (reviewed recently in [15]). Gene phoP encodes a two-component phosphate-response regulator homologous to B. subtilis phoP, which plays a crucial role in controlling the biosynthesis of teichoic acid, a key component of the gram-positive bacterial cell wall [16].

Tsumura [13] classified the different location of obstructive band adhesions and estimated their frequency: anterior visceroparietal adhesions (between anterior abdominal wall and small bowel) (40%), anterior visceroparietal adhesions associated to viscerovisceral adhesions (small bowel) (32%), viscerovisceral adhesions (small bowel) (16%), posterior visceroparietal adhesions (between posterior peritoneum and small bowel) (8%), anterior and posterior visceroparietal adhesions associated AZD5153 concentration to viscerovisceral adhesions (4%). The incidence of laparotomic conversions is major in patients with anterior peritoneal band adhesions (anterior visceroparietal adhesions, anterior visceroparietal

adhesions associated to viscerovisceral adhesions and viscerovisceral adhesions) compared to patients with posterior band adhesions (posterior visceroparietal adhesions, anterior and posterior visceroparietal adhesions associated to viscerovisceral adhesions) (50% vs 22.7%). Other main causes for laparotomic conversion are the presence of bowel necrosis, which always needs a resection imperatively performed laparotomically [46, 53], and accidental

enterotomies. The frequency of accidental enterotomies is variable (Table 2) [15, 16, 18–22, 24–27, 29, 38, 39, 41, 42], being more frequent in patients who have a history of previous multiple laparotomies selleckchem [3, 19]. Most of the accidental enterotomies occur while performing adhesiolysis. The other less common mechanism of injury is the Verres needle insertion, reported in the Levard’s [25], Parent’s [26] and Chèvre’s [27] series. It is often necessary to perform a laparotomic conversion in order to suture or to perform a resection and anastomosis of the perforated bowel. The suture performed through open access gives more chances of endurance and safety, especially when done on a dilated and fragile obstructed bowel [54]. When the accidental enterotomy is not pointed out at operating time, it can show

up in postoperative course as a peritonitis that increases morbidity and mortality. Unrecognized accidental enterotomies, discovered by the onset of postoperative peritonitis, are an increasingly frequent cause of malpractice claims [55]. Defensive medicine has Bucladesine mouse delineated many practical strategies in order to avoid accidental enterotomies during laparoscopic adhesiolysis: PtdIns(3,4)P2 accurate patient selection excluding patients with history of multiple abdominal surgical procedures and taking early indication for surgical treatment, and particular attention to surgical techniques [56] always staying close to parietal peritoneum during dissection, not sectioning tenacious band adhesions and always controlling the direction of the instruments. Borzellino routinely performs a preoperatory ultrasonographic mapping of visceroparietal adhesions, in order to avoid lesions resulting from Veress’ needle insertion [24].

[28] reported that nanowires have a phase transformation after ion implantation. The Ga-implanted GaN nanowires transform from hexagonal phase to cubic phase. They ascribed this effect to two main reasons: one is that the accumulation of Ga ions have reduced the surface energy and stabilized the cubic phase, check details and the other possible reason is the short-range order fluctuations caused by dynamic annealing during the implantation process. The effect

of the properties caused by ion implantation When the ions are implanted into the nanomaterials, the ions will collide with the target atoms and charges. As noted previously, the collision processes include three different modes: nuclear collision, electron collision, and charge exchange. Incident ions lose the energy during every collision process and may be stopped within the materials as Nutlin-3a ic50 impurity atoms. It is common that most of

these incident ions stay at the interstitial sites, and these interstitial impurities may migrate to substitutional positions after annealing. This substitutional doping enables the nanomaterials to get more admirable properties. Electrical properties After ion implantation and annealing, the carrier concentration of nanomaterials may increase dramatically and even the conductive type of nanomaterials PCI-32765 in vivo may be converted by this fierce process. Without annealing, the implanted nanomaterials revealed worse conductivity, attributing to the damaged crystal lattice. In order to recover the crystal lattice, subsequent annealing is essential. On the other hand, annealing also provides the condition to activate impurity atoms. Kanungo et al. [29] utilized ion implantation to achieve the n- and p-doping

of silicon nanowires. Figure 5a,b,c shows the I-V curves of B-implanted Si nanowires, P-implanted Si nanowires, and As-implanted Si nanowires, respectively [29]. In all the I-V curves of the implanted nanowires in Figure 5, compared with those of the unimplanted nanowires, the conductivity of the implanted nanowires were observably enhanced. Comparing all the curves of Figure 5, the B-implanted Si nanowires have the highest conductivity. Boron is a light element which can easily substitute for the silicon ions at 850°C, and high-crystalline quality B-doped Si nanowires were acquired AMP deaminase after subsequent annealing. P-implanted Si nanowires and As-implanted nanowires revealed lower conductivity; this must be attributed to the enhanced surface depletion [30]. The interaction of defects enhanced the diffusivity of the P atoms [31]. After annealing, most of the P atoms diffused out of the Si nanowires. These atoms staying on the surface of the nanowires can enhance the surface depletion. Stichtenoth et al. [17] fabricated p-type doped GaAs nanowires by zinc ion implantation. After Zn ion implantation, the sample was annealed at 800°C for 30 min, and then the conductivity of the GaAs nanowire increased in several orders of magnitude (Figure 6). Zeiner et al.

We further observed concentration of Rickettsia at the circumference of the bacteriocyte, suggesting a stage in which Rickettsia concentrates around the developing oocytes for entry, for transferral to the next generation. Conclusions Our study describes the distribution of two whitefly species in Croatia and their infection and co-infection status by secondary symbionts. Co-infections revealed a unique pattern of co-sharing the bacteriocyte by the primary and

different secondary symbionts. Co-sharing of the same cell by multiple symbionts while maintaining infections over time by vertical transmission through the egg is unique in whiteflies. This sharing provides a unique system to study interactions among bacteria that co-inhabit the same cell. Positive and/or negative

interactions among these symbionts–cooperation and antagonism–are part of the see more multiple interactions that one can expect within their small niche. Competition between symbionts for space and resources may NU7441 in vitro affect their small environment and their host. The host can be affected through competition between the primary and secondary symbionts within the bacteriocyte. Such microbial diversity provides a unique opportunity for artificial interference and manipulation to disrupt this diverse community as a better means of controlling whiteflies, which are major pests in many agricultural systems. Methods Whitefly collections Populations of the sweet potato whitefly B. tabaci and the greenhouse whitefly T. vaporariorum were collected during the years 2008-2009 across Croatia. Attempts were made to include populations from all parts of the country, but in some areas, no whiteflies could be found. In addition, three populations were collected from Bosnia and Herzegovina, and one population from Monte Negro for comparison with nearby countries. The whiteflies were collected from the plants into glass Pasteur pipettes attached to a mechanical hand-held aspirator. Each collected population Branched chain aminotransferase in each location

was collected from different leafs on different plants. Some of the populations were collected in greenhouses, and some in open fields and private gardens. Table 1 shows a list of the collected whitefly populations from the different locations and the host plants on which these populations were collected. After collection, all adult individuals were immediately transferred to absolute ethanol for preservation and were kept at room temperature until processing for secondary-symbiont screening. Whitefly population rearing After collection from the field, three whitefly populations (Zadar, Kastela, Turanj) were directly transferred as adults to insect-proof cages containing cotton cv. Acala seedlings (obtained from Zeraim Gedera, Israel). These adults were given a week to lay eggs and to Idasanutlin establish a colony. The colonies were then maintained in the laboratory under standard conditions (26 ± 2°C, 60% RH, 14/10 h of light/dark).

In vitro uptake of apoptotic body mimicking phosphatidylserine-quantum dot micelles by

monocytic cell line. (DOCX 5 MB) References 1. Moore KJ, Tabas I: Macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Cell 2011, 145:341–355.CrossRef 2. Saha P, Modarai B, Humphries J, Mattock K, Waltham M, Burnand KG, Smith A: The monocyte/macrophage as a therapeutic target in atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2009, 9:109–118.CrossRef 3. Jaffer FA, Libby P, Weissleder R: Optical and multimodality molecular imaging: insights into atherosclerosis. Circulation 2007, 116:1052–1061.CrossRef 4. Shaw SY: Molecular imaging in cardiovascular disease: selleck screening library targets and opportunities. Nat Rev Cardiol 2009, 6:569–579.CrossRef 5. Desai MY, Schoenhagen P: Emergence of targeted molecular imaging in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2009, 7:197–203.CrossRef 6. Krahling S, Callahan MK, Williamson P, Schlegel RA: Exposure of phosphatidylserine is a general feature in the phagocytosis of apoptotic lymphocytes by macrophages. Cell Death Differ 1999, 6:183–189.CrossRef 7. Fadok VA, Bratton DL, Rose DM, Pearson A, Ezekewitz RA, Henson PM: A receptor for phosphatidylserine-ROCK inhibitor specific clearance of apoptotic cells. Nature 2000, 405:85–90.CrossRef 8. Moghimi SM, Hunter AC: Recognition by macrophages and liver cells of opsonized phospholipid find more vesicles and phospholipid headgroups.

Pharm Res 2001, 18:1–8.CrossRef 9. Fadok VA, Voelker DR, Campbell PA, Cohen JJ, Bratton DL, Henson PM: Exposure of phosphatidylserine on the surface of apoptotic lymphocytes triggers specific recognition and removal by macrophages. J Immunol 1992, 148:2207–2216. 10. Maiseyeu A, Mihai G, Roy S, Kherada N, Simonetti OP, Sen CK: Detection of macrophages via paramagnetic vesicles incorporating oxidatively tailored Adenylyl cyclase cholesterol ester: an approach for atherosclerosis imaging. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2010, 5:1341–1356.CrossRef 11. Torchilin VP: Recent advances with

liposomes as pharmaceutical carriers. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2005, 4:145–160.CrossRef 12. Owens DE, Peppas NA: Opsonization, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of polymeric nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 2006, 307:93–102.CrossRef 13. Torchilin VP: Micellar nanocarriers: pharmaceutical perspectives. Pharm Res 2007, 24:1–16.CrossRef 14. Torchilin VP: PEG-based micelles as carriers of contrast agents for different imaging modalities. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002, 54:235–252.CrossRef 15. Cormode DP, Skajaa T, Schooneveld MMV, Koole R, Jarzyna P, Lobatto ME, Calcagno C, Barazza A, Gordon RE, Zanzonico P, Fisher EA, Fayad ZA, Mulder WJM: Nanocrystal core high-density lipoproteins: A multimodality contrast agent platform. Nanoletters 2008, 8:3715–3723.CrossRef 16. Andrew MS, Hongwei D, Aaron MM, Nie S: Bioconjugated quantum dots for in vivo molecular and cellular imaging. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008, 60:1226–1240.CrossRef 17.

In the hexamers, these differences result in slight

variations in the convex surfaces and monomer–monomer interactions, respectively. From structure, as well as sequence alignments, one can identify the residues that are structurally conserved and important to the hexamer–hexamer interactions. For example, the absolutely conserved D-X-X-X-K (Fig. 4a, 8) motif located at the hexamer edges forms the interface between two hexamers. A less conserved R-P-H-X-N (Fig. 4a) at the hexamer edges also contributes to the interface between two adjacent hexamers. Fig. 7 Stereo images of superpositioned single-domain BMC monomers from the β- (blue shades) and α- (green shades) carboxysomes. The upper pair is viewed from the convex side of the protein, whereas the bottom view is rotated clockwise 90° about the x-axis from the upper view. One pore residue (Arg from CcmK4, Lys from see more CcmK1 and CcmK2, Phe from CsoS1A and CsoS1C) and the conserved Lys found at the edge of the hexamer are shown in yellow sticks. The regions flanked by brackets are those that display the largest structural differences between the Cso and CcmK type shell proteins Fig. 8 Conservation of all unique single-domain carboxysome

BMC shell proteins mapped onto the structure of CcmK2 (PDB: 2A1B). Key residues are shown in sticks and labeled (Figure prepared using the Consurf (Ashkenazy et al. 2010) server and PyMOL) The primary structures of CsoS1B, CcmK1, and CcmK4 contain a C-terminal extension find more of ~10 residues compared to their paralogs. A comparison of

the structures of CcmK2 and CcmK4 from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 reveals that the additional C-terminal residues of CcmK4 form an α helix. In CcmK2 a short, five residue helix occludes the depression in the concave face of the hexamer; in CcmK4 the additional C-terminal residues form an extended helix that folds back on the edge of the hexamer, leaving the concave side unobstructed (Figs. 6, 7). The structure of CcmK1 is missing its C-terminal 17 residues (Tanaka et al. 2009), but based on sequence similarity to the XAV-939 cost C-terminus of CcmK4 it could likewise be helical. This C-terminal extension may offer clues to the as yet unknown from orientation of the shell proteins with regard to which side faces the cytosol. If facing the interior of the carboxysome, the disposition of this helix may be important for interacting with encapsulated proteins. A second hypothesis is that the orientation of the helix might act as a switch that can change the propensity for incorporation of the shell protein into an assembling shell (Kerfeld et al. 2005). Pentameric proteins of the carboxysome shell Representative structures of proteins containing the Pfam03319 domain have been solved from both the α- and β-carboxysome (Tanaka et al. 2008).

As we have previously reported for P. aeruginosa [14], Smoothened Agonist research buy within each isomeric pair, the rhamnolipid congener with the shortest chain adjacent to the sugar moiety is more abundant. To verify whether the rhamnolipids produced by B. MS 275 thailandensis share this characteristic, they were subjected to an enzymatic hydrolysis of their rhamnose groups with naringinase [30] to produce the corresponding HAAs. The same stoichiometrical preference was confirmed. Figure 2 Congener analysis of rhamnolipids from B. thailandensis. A) Mass spectra of the fragmented m/z 587, 615 and 643 pseudomolecular ions of congeners Rha-C12-C14, Rha-C14-C12, Rha-C14-C14, Rha-C14-C16 and Rha-C16-C14.

B) Schematic representation of observed fragmentation patterns of a monorhamnolipid. Evofosfamide mw C) Daughter ions generated by fragmentation of the specified congeners. With these results in hand, we investigated the potential of the highly genetically related species B. pseudomallei to produce a range of rhamnolipids other than the previously described Rha-Rha-C14-C14. Figure 3 shows the production of the most abundant rhamnolipids by this pathogen. The same long-chain bearing congeners found in B. thailandensis were also discovered in B. pseudomallei, including the dominant Rha-Rha-C14-C14.

Figure 3 Production of the most abundant dirhamnolipids in a B. pseudomallei 1026b culture. Bacteria were grown in NB supplemented with 4% glycerol as carbon source. Rhamnolipids were quantified by LC/MS. Critical Micelle Concentration (CMC) and surface tension assays To investigate the potential of the long-chain rhamnolipids produced by Burkholderia species for lowering surface tension, the critical micelle concentration of this mixture of rhamnolipid congeners was established (Figure 4). At the CMC of about 250 mg/L, the surface tension is lowered to 43 mN/m. Figure 4 Surface tension and CMC value. Surface tension of the total mixture of rhamnolipids and HAAs extracted from a B. thailandensis E264 culture. Each data point shows the mean of triplicate measurements. Error

bars represent the Standard Deviation (SD). Casein kinase 1 Both rhlA alleles are functional and necessary for maximal rhamnolipid production The contribution to rhamnolipid production of the two identical rhl gene clusters found on the B. thailandensis genome was tested by creating single ΔrhlA mutants for each allele, as well as a double ΔrhlA mutant. These three mutants were then investigated for their ability to produce rhamnolipids (Figure 5). Five sets of replicates confirmed that the B. thailandensis ΔrhlA1 mutant produces more rhamnolipids than the ΔrhlA2 mutant. The rhamnolipids produced by each of these mutants are composed of the same congeners in the same proportions as the wild type strain and only a quantitative difference is observed.

Section I is characterized by the exponential decline in the deposition voltage, section II by the constant deposition voltage. The linear increase of R s could be understood in terms of the Co nanowire growth. Dasatinib in vivo With proceeding deposition time, the Co nanowires increase their length contributing to the series resistence as well as, e.g. ohmic losses in the electrolyte. A negative resistance can be understood as a process that is acting similar as a catalyst supporting the reaction. Hoare [21] found for

Ni that boric acid in the deposition electrolyte acts in such a way that it is supporting the Ni deposition by forming complexes that can be reduced at lower overpotential compared to the boric acid-free electrolyte. Thus, the transfer resistance R p and the process time constant τ p could describe the influence of boric acid on the Co deposition in ultra-high aspect ratio InP pore arrays. The increase of R p towards more

negative values could be due to an increase selleck kinase inhibitor in the selleck chemicals llc concentration of boric acid in the pores with increasing deposition time as a result of a reduced diffusion limitation, since the Co nanowires grow towards the pore openings reducing the effective pore depth. The stronger oscillations in R p might be due to a competition for adsorbing sites on the Co nanowire surface between boric acid-complexed Co ions and other adsorbed species. The Maxwell resistance R a could be related

to the charge transfer resistance of the direct Co deposition. The decline in the first three minutes could be due to the diffusion limitation of the boric acid that forms complexes with Co2+ ions for an easier deposition. The following linear rise might be attributed to an increased surface coverage of the growing Co nanowires by adsorbed ions impeding the Co deposition. The constant level in R a after 16 min coincides with the constant level in R p suggesting that these adsorbed ions might be related to boric acid, such as e.g. B(OH)4 −. The ending of the diffusion limitation for the boric acid Fossariinae might be the reason for the constant level in R a after 16 min. The Maxwell capacity C a could be attributed to the corresponding double layer capacity of the direct Co deposition. The decline in C a correlates with the concentration increase of boric acid species due to a reduced diffusion limitation (see time dependence of R p) and mirrors also the constant level after 16 min. The Maxwell resistance R b and the capacity C b describe the slowest process during the Co deposition. It could be related to the indirect Co deposition via Co(OH)2 as experimentally observed by Santos et al. [18]. This process takes place in parallel to the direct Co deposition process. Therefore, R b is assigned to the charge transfer resistance of the Co deposition process via Co(OH)2.

CSCs are also associated with chemoresistance, relapse, and metastasis [156]. Mani et al. reported that EMT could induce stem-like Lonafarnib properties in non-cancerous mammary epithelial cells [14]. The CD44high/CD24low phenotype correlates with both breast CSCs and normal mammary stem cells, and both Snail1- and Twist-induced EMTs stimulated this same phenotype in nontumorigenic human mammary epithelial cells (HMLEs). These EMTs also increased the HMLEs’ mammosphere-forming ability thirty-fold, and the CD44high/CD24low cells are able to produce

more CD44high/CD24low cells in addition to CD44low/CD24high cells. Furthermore, these CD44high/CD24low cells exhibited a JSH-23 order decrease of E-cadherin expression along with elevated

fibronectin, vimentin, Snail1, and Twist, as measured by RT-PCR [14]. Thus, EMT promotes self-renewal capabilities and the stem-like phenotype. Given that Snail1 induced EMT and a stem-like phenotype in human colorectal cancer cells (as mentioned in “Colorectal Carcinoma,” above), Zhou et al. examined human pancreatic cancer cells and reached similar conclusions [15]. Epithelial BxPC-3 cells were compared with more morphologically diverse Panc-1 cells, and the comparison identified Panc-1 cells, which had higher Snail1 expression and were more poorly differentiated than BxPC-3 cells, as CSChigh with a larger ALDHhigh population [15]. Stem cells’ pluripotent capabilities are maintained in part by the polycomb complex protein BMI-1 (Bmi-1), homeobox protein ARS-1620 ic50 Nanog, sex-determining region Y-box 2 (Sox2), and octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct4) [157–159]. Snail1 silencing resulted in a decrease in ALDH, Sox-2, Oct-4, and invasive properties. Following Snail1 knockdown, E-cadherin expression increased as vimentin and ZEB1 expressions both decreased. Without Snail1, the Panc-1 cells underwent MET and consequently

lost their stem-like phenotype [15]. In a similar study of non-small cell lung cancer, Wang et al. compared ciplatin-resistant A549 cells with their A549 counterparts [16]. A549/CDDP cells showed increased expression levels of Nanog, Oct4, and Bmi-1, as detected by Western blot. RT-PCR also showed increased CD44 and Sox2. Migratory and invasive capacities were increased in A549/CDDP cells, as Etofibrate well. Interestingly, only Snail1 expression was elevated in A549/CDDP cells—Slug, Twist, and ZEB1 were not influential factors in this comparison. Snail1 knockdown again caused a decline in migration, invasiveness, Bmi-1 expression, Oct-4 expression, and mammosphere-forming ability. E-cadherin increased as vimentin decreased, and the cells became more responsive to cisplatin [16]. Since β-catenin had effects on the system comparable to active Snail1, an antagonist of the PI3K/Akt pathway was introduced, and this resulted in a decrease in β-catenin, Snail1, Nanog, migration, invasiveness, and mammosphere-forming ability [16].

J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 2005, 10:26–39.PubMedCrossRef 7. Miller

VL, Taylor RK, Mekalanos JJ: Cholera toxin transcriptional activator ToxR is a transmembrane DNA binding protein. Cell 1987, 48:271–279.PubMedCrossRef 8. Dell CL, Neely MN, Olson ER: Altered pH and lysine signalling mutants of cadC , a gene encoding a membrane-bound transcriptional activator of the Escherichia coli cadBA operon. Mol Microbiol 1994, 14:7–16.PubMedCrossRef 9. Gao R, Stock AM: Biological insights from structures C646 of two-component proteins. Annu Rev Microbiol 2009, 63:133–154.PubMedCrossRef 10. Haneburger I, Eichinger A, Skerra A, Jung K: New insights into the signaling mechanism of the pH-responsive, membrane-integrated transcriptional activator CadC of Escherichia coli . J Biol Chem 2011, 286:10681–10689.PubMedCrossRef 11. Tetsch L, Koller C, Haneburger I, Jung K: The membrane-integrated transcriptional activator CadC of Escherichia coli senses lysine indirectly via the interaction with the lysine permease LysP. Mol Microbiol 2008, 67:570–583.PubMedCrossRef Thiazovivin 12. Ottemann KM, Mekalanos JJ: The ToxR protein of Vibrio cholerae forms homodimers and heterodimers. J Bacteriol 1996, 178:156–162.PubMed 13. Chatterjee T, Saha RP, Chakrabarti P: Structural studies on Vibrio cholerae ToxR periplasmic and

cytoplasmic domains. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007, 1774:1331–1338.PubMed 14. Dziejman M, Kolmar H, Fritz HJ, Mekalanos JJ: ToxR co-operative interactions are not modulated by environmental conditions or periplasmic domain conformation. Mol Microbiol 1999, 31:305–317.PubMedCrossRef 15. Eichinger A, Haneburger I, Koller C, Jung K, Skerra A: Crystal structure of the sensory domain of Escherichia coli CadC, a member of the ToxR-like protein family. Protein Sci 2011, 20:656–669.PubMedCrossRef

16. Leichert LI, Jakob U: Protein thiol AZD1152 manufacturer modifications visualized in vivo . PLoS Biol 2004, 2:e333.PubMedCrossRef 17. Urocanase Zheng C, Ma G, Su Z: Native PAGE eliminates the problem of PEG-SDS interaction in SDS-PAGE and provides an alternative to HPLC in characterization of protein PEGylation. Electrophoresis 2007, 28:2801–2807.PubMedCrossRef 18. Anderson DE, Becktel WJ, Dahlquist FW: pH-induced denaturation of proteins: a single salt bridge contributes 3–5 kcal/mol to the free energy of folding of T4 lysozyme. Biochemistry 1990, 29:2403–2408.PubMedCrossRef 19. Neely MN, Dell CL, Olson ER: Roles of LysP and CadC in mediating the lysine requirement for acid induction of the Escherichia coli cad operon. J Bacteriol 1994, 176:3278–3285.PubMed 20. Vertommen D, Depuydt M, Pan J, Leverrier P, Knoops L, Szikora JP, et al.: The disulphide isomerase DsbC cooperates with the oxidase DsbA in a DsbD-independent manner. Mol Microbiol 2008, 67:336–349.PubMed 21. Reid E, Cole J, Eaves DJ: The Escherichia coli CcmG protein fulfils a specific role in cytochrome c assembly. Biochem J 2001, 355:51–58.PubMedCrossRef 22.