J Appl Phys 2010, 108:076101.CrossRef 17. Xu Q, Wen Z, Wu D: Bipolar
and unipolar resistive switching in Zn 0.98 Cu 0.02 O films. J Phys D Appl Phys 2011, 44:335104.CrossRef 18. Hu W, Chen X, Wu G, Lin Y, Qin N, Bao D: Bipolar and tri-state unipolar resistive switching behaviors in Ag/ZnFe 2 O 4 /Pt memory devices. Appl Phys Lett 2012, 101:063501.CrossRef 19. Peng P, Xie D, Yang Y, Zhou C, Ma S, Feng T, Tian H, Ren T: Bipolar and unipolar resistive switching effects in Al/DLC/W structure. J Phys D Appl Phys 2012, 45:365103.CrossRef 20. Jeong DS, Schroeder H, Waser R: Coexistence of bipolar and unipolar resistive switching behaviors in a Pt/TiO 2 /Pt stack. Electrochem Solid-State FDA-approved Drug Library datasheet Lett 2007,10(8):G51-G53.CrossRef 21. Kannan V, Senthilkumar V, Rhee JK: Multi-level conduction in NiO resistive memory device prepared by
solution route. J Phys D Appl Phys 2013, 46:095301.CrossRef 22. Yang JJ, Strukov DB, Stewart DR: Memristive devices for computing. Nat Nanotechn 2013, 8:13–24.CrossRef 23. Lee JK, Jung S, Park J, Chung SW, Roh JS, Hong SJ, Cho IIH, Kwon HI, Park CH, Park BG, Lee JH: Accurate analysis of conduction and resistive-switching mechanisms in double-layered resistive-switching memory devices. Appl Phys Lett 2012, 101:103506.CrossRef 24. Hota MK, Caraveo-Frescas JA, McLachlan MA, Alshareef HN: Electroforming-free resistive switching memory effect Selleck AZD1208 in transparent p-type tin monoxide. Appl Phys Lett 2014, 104:152104.CrossRef 25. Akinaga H, Shima H: Resistive random access
Teicoplanin memory (ReRAM) based on metal oxides. Proc IEEE 2010, 98:2237–2251.CrossRef Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions XCY and XHW carried out the sample preparation, participated on its analysis, performed all the analyses, and wrote the paper. JLT and HZZ provided useful suggestions and helped analyze the characterization results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Background Greenhouse gases such as CO2 and chlorofluorocarbon (CFCs) are the primary causes of global warming. The atmospheric concentration of CO2 has steadily increased owing to human activity, and this accelerates the greenhouse effect. The photocatalytic reduction of CO2 is a promising technical solution since it uses readily available sunlight to convert CO2 into valuable chemicals, such as methanol or methane, in a carbon friendly manner [1]. TiO2 is a popular catalyst for photoreduction of CO2 owing to the advantages of earth abundance, low toxicity, and chemical stability. Yet it has so far yielded only low carbon dioxide conversion rates despite using ultraviolet illumination for band gap excitations [2]. While the intrinsic idea of photocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide and water (vapor) into hydrocarbon fuels is appealing, the process has historically suffered from low conversion rates.