When it is impossible for the patient to complete the questionnaires independently, the informal caregiver is allowed to assist the patient. Table Table11 gives an overview of the questionnaires used in the
study. Table 1 Questionnaires used in the study Primary outcome The ESAS is an easy to complete questionnaire developed for use in daily symptom assessment of palliative care patients. The patient rates the presence and severity of the following nine symptoms common in cancer patients: pain, activity, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, sense of well-being and shortness of breath. An optional Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical tenth symptom can be added by the patient [33]. The items are rated on 0-10 visual numerical scales (with 10 being the worst imaginable intensity of a symptom). The ESAS is widely used and proven to be reliable [34,35]. The HADS is a 14-item self-report screening scale that was originally developed to indicate the possible presence of anxiety and depressive states Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical in the setting of a medical non-psychiatric out-patient clinic.
It contains two 7-item subscales on anxiety and depression. Each item scores on a 4-point Likert scale. The questionnaire assesses symptoms over the preceding week [36]. Psychometric properties of the HADS were assessed in six different groups of Dutch Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical subjects (N = 6165). Homogeneity and test-retest reliability of the total scale and the subscales Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical were considered adequate. The dimensional structure and reliability of the HADS is considered to be stable across medical settings and age groups [37]. Secondary outcomes The PNPC is a self-reporting questionnaire for patients covering all dimensions of palliative care to investigate their problems and (unmet) palliative care needs. Experienced problems and needs for care are addressed separately, because
patients could have had adequate assistance despite enduring symptom suffering. The original questionnaire with its 90 items has shown validity and reliability, L-NAME HCl but is not always Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical AZD0530 cell line practical for palliative patients. Therefore, a short version of 33 items has been developed and validated. This PNPC- short version was tested on 94 patients with metastatic cancer and has demonstrated construct validity. The dimension reliability was satisfactory, although two domains were less coherent [38]. The PSQ is a 5-item visual-analogue screening tool to measure patients’ satisfaction, as well as doctor’s satisfaction, following the consultation [39]. The questionnaire is developed and tested in the home situation in the Netherlands. Physician satisfaction turned out to be substantially lower than patient satisfaction, both at item level and at overall satisfaction level [39]. This finding is consistent with other patient satisfaction studies [40,41].