Respondents with primary caregivers who are “”other”" relatives o

Respondents with primary caregivers who are “”other”" relatives or nonrelatives, who are not coresident with the care receiver, or who are assisted by secondary helpers were at elevated risk for care transitions over the 2-year study period.

The results of this study suggest that

older persons’ care transitions result from complex informal network dynamics, with primary caregiver gender and relationship to the care receiver playing key roles.”
“In schizophrenia, well-replicated findings support an attenuated niacin skin-flush response. We have previously buy Gemcitabine reported a delayed skin-flush after niacin ingestion and also an association between niacin non-responding and electrodermal non-responding in schizophrenia. The stability of the niacin and electrodermal tests was now studied in a test-retest design. An

additional aim was to assess the association previously found.

Twenty-three AZD5363 molecular weight patients with schizophrenia underwent two sessions 3 months apart during which an oral niacin test was conducted and electrodermal activity was measured. Despite similar values for niacin outcome variables at the group level, there was high intraindividual variation. Test-retest stability for the oral niacin test was thus low, although a trend toward correlation for the dichotomous response criterion was found. Most electrodermal measures correlated between baseline and retest. A significant association between the tests was again found; niacin non-responding implied electrodermal non-responding, providing further support for a common underlying aberration in schizophrenia. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“Research on family relations has extensively used the intergenerational solidarity model proposed by Bengtson

and colleagues. Recently, the relevance of this model for explaining changes in family relations has been questioned, and the concept of intergenerational ambivalence has been proposed as a relevant addition to the model, supposedly acting as a catalyst, and thus serving as an explanation for changes in family relations. This study tests both the viability of the intergenerational solidarity model and the hypothesized Dynein effect of ambivalence employing longitudinal data.

We use data from 2 waves of the Netherlands’ Kinship Panel Study on parent-adult child relationships to estimate latent variable structural equation models.

Affection, association, and support between family members are core, mutually reinforcing dimensions of solidarity. The hypothesis that ambivalence is a catalyst for change in family relations was not confirmed. Adding conflict separately revealed that it only affects the core solidarity dimensions but is itself, like normative and structural solidarity, not influenced by them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>