yuanmingense and Bradyrhizobium sp. Similarly, sequence 115 isolated from Glenda in South Africa shared a common clade with sequence 68 from 8 of the 9 cowpea genotypes (except Omondaw) grown in all 3 countries, and clustered with Bradyrhizobium sp ORS 188, ORS 190 and USDA 3384, Selumetinib mw just as sequence 103 isolated from South Africa and Botswana with Glenda, Brown eye and Fahari as trap hosts clustered around Bradyrhizobium sp ORS 3409 and CIRADc12. Perhaps the most important finding from the CP673451 phylogenetic aspect of this study is the fact that cluster 2 (consisting

of sequences 5, 201, 22, 117, and 153) formed its own distinct group, suggesting that it is a new Bradyrhizobium species (Figure 3). What is also unique about this cluster is that all the sequences (i.e. 5, 22, 117, 153 and 146, except for 201) originated from South Africa, though isolated from different cowpea genotypes (see Tables 4 and 5), again underscoring the greater Bradyrhizobium SBE-��-CD biodiversity in South Africa. Sequence 106

was the only one related to the B. elkanii group (see cluster 3, Figure 3), and was isolated only from South Africa with Apagbaala as trap host (Tables 4 and 5). Although some reports claim to have isolated both bradyrhizobia (slow-growing) and rhizobia (fast-growing) from root nodules of cowpea [2, 26], a recent study [9] found only Bradyrhizobium species in the root nodules of cowpea grown in South Africa and Botswana. In contrast, the Chinese have identified both rhizobia and bradyrhizobia in cowpea nodules [8]. In this study, we also found only bradyrhizobial strains in cowpea nodules when bacterial DNA was analyzed directly from nodules of cowpea plants grown in Ghana, Botswana and South Africa (see Figure 3). Taken together, the data from studies of nodule occupancy,

PCR-RFLP analysis, IGS type symbiotic efficiency and gene sequencing indicate Vitamin B12 greater biodiversity of cowpea bradyryhizobia in Africa, especially in South Africa. This was evidenced by the different IGS types found in cowpea nodules, as well as the phylogenetically-diverse groups obtained from the Genbank database. The observed strain diversity associated with the 9 cowpea genotypes led to different levels of IGS type symbiotic efficacy in same hosts at different sites, and in different hosts at same experimental site (Figure 2). Thus, the differences in IGS type diversity and symbiotic efficiency could account for the genotype × environment interaction that made it difficult to select superior cowpea genotypes for use across Africa. In this study, the origin of cowpea genotypes showed no specific trend in their ability to trap IGS types across the 3 countries. However, many IGS types appeared to have clustered along geographical lines (Figure 1); for example, cluster 2 consisted exclusively of IGS types isolated from soils in Southern Africa.