This follows the “”use it or lose it”" concept, whereby genes whi

This follows the “”use it or lose it”" concept, whereby genes which no longer provide a selective advantage to the bacteria become pseudogenes [46]. The amino acid similarity of Ifp to both invasin and intimin, coupled with its retention CB-839 in Y. pseudotuberculosis, suggests a putative role for Ifp in adhesion to cells and that Ifp is a new member in the family of surface adhesins together with invasin and intimin. The C-terminal 280 amino acids of intimin are the functional domain in this adhesin [28], and two cysteine (C859 and C937; numbering according to EPEC strain E2348/69) and four tryptophan (W776, W795, W881 and W899) residues are conserved between all intimin

subtypes. An alignment of the C-terminal region amino acid sequences of α-subtype intimin from EPEC, Y. pseudotuberculosis invasin and Ifp, revealed that both cysteine and three out of the four tryptophan residues were found to be conserved in both Ifp and invasin (Figure 1). Only W776 was not conserved in Ifp and invasin. These cysteine and tryptophan residues are involved in receptor binding by intimin [27, 30] and therefore may have a role in Ifp receptor binding. We demonstrated direct binding of Ifp using both flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy, where the MBP-Ifp fusion proteins could bind to HEp-2 cells. By contrast the MBP alone did not bind and the specific cysteine Stattic price residue

mutant MBP-IfpC337G showed greatly reduced levels of binding (Figures 3 and 4). This reduced level of binding with the MBP-IfpC337G shows that the cysteine residue is important to allow Ifp binding. The same cysteine residue is

known to be important in both intimin and invasin, through the formation of a disulphide bond [18, 29], therefore it may be that the cysteine has a similar role in Ifp. The width of the FACS fluorescence intensity Erastin cost graph suggests that MBP-Ifp does not bind uniformly to all cells (Figure 3). This was confirmed by confocal microscopy, where the cells which were exposed to the MBP-Ifp fusion protein, showed a Abemaciclib mouse pattern of fluorescence of intensely stained localised areas, instead of scattered fluorescence across the cell surface. A similar pattern of adherence was observed when HEp-2 cells were incubated with MBP fusion proteins of intimin and invasin [18]. As invasin is known to bind to β1 integrins and it has been suggested that intimin can bind to β1 integrin [13, 24, 25] co-localisation of Ifp to β1 integrin was investigated (Figure 5B). As no co-localisation was observed it shows that Ifp binds to alternative receptors on the cell surface. Lipid rafts are sphingolipid and cholesterol rich regions of the plasma membrane, into which Tir is thought to be transferred [47, 48]. Additionally uropathogenic E. coli are known to invade via lipid rafts [49], and Salmonella and Shigella sp. use a type three secretion system to translocate effectors, by binding to cholesterol within lipid rafts [50].

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>