The ultimate atomic-scale thickness of the present system leads t

The ultimate atomic-scale thickness of the present system leads to a very large λ ⊥ in the order of millimeters [8], thus making it a candidate for observing the KT transition. We fitted the experimental data of R □ using Equation 6 within the range of 2.25 Kselleck compound superconductor, which is not applicable

to the ( )-In surface with high crystallinity. Unfortunately, the present experimental setup does not allow us to observe the expected temperature dependence of Equation 6 down to T K because of the presence of the stray magnetic field. Furthermore, the predicted I-V characteristics V∝I a where the exponent a jumps from 1 to 3 at T K should be examined to conclude the observation of the KT

transition [31, 32]. Construction of a UHV-compatible cryostat with an effective magnetic shield and a lower achievable temperature will be indispensible for such future studies. Conclusions We have find more studied the resistive phase transition of the ( )-In surface in detail for a series of samples. In the normal state, the sheet resistances R □ of the samples decrease significantly between 20 and

5 K, which amounts to 5% to 15% of the residual resistivity R res. Their characteristic temperature dependence Liothyronine Sodium suggests the importance of electron-electron scattering in electron transport phenomena. The poor correlation between the variations in T c and R res indicate different mechanisms for determining these quantities. The decrease in R □ was progressively accelerated just above T c due to the superconducting fluctuation effects. Quantitative analysis indicates the selleck kinase inhibitor parallel contributions of fluctuating Cooper pairs corresponding to the AL and MT terms. A minute but finite resistance tail was found below T c down to the lowest temperature of 1.8 K, which may be ascribed to a dissipation due to free vortex flow. The interpretation of the data based on the KT transition was proposed, but further experiments with an improved cryostat are required for the conclusion. Acknowledgements This work was partly supported by World Premier International Research Center (WPI) Initiative on Materials Nanoarchitectonics, MEXT, Japan, and by the Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows. The authors thank M. Aono at MANA, NIMS, for his stimulous discussions. References 1. Lifshits VG, Saranin AA, Zotov AV: Surface Phases on Silicon: Preparation, Structures, and Properties. Chichester: Wiley; 1994. 2. Mönch W: Semiconductor Surfaces and Interfaces. Berlin: Springer; 2001.CrossRef 3.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>