It is clear from the support levels for Cuphophyllus, however, that multigene analyses are needed to resolve the structure and branching order of this group; new genes are also needed. There are no sequences of C. cinereus (Fr,) Bon or C. hygrocyboides (Kühner) Bon, the respective types of sect. Cinerei (Bataille) Bon (1989, p. 56) and Hygrocyboideini (Clémençon) Bon. Only ITS sequences are available for C. subviolaceus,

the type of Cuphophyllus subsect. “Viscidini A.H. Sm. & Hesler) Bon and sect. “Viscidi” (Hesler & A.H. Sm.) Singer (1972*) (both invalid, Art. 36.1 – the basionym in Smith and Hesler 1942 lacked a Latin description; *Singer 1986 cited Singer 1972, but this reference was not found); preliminary analyses (Matheny, unpublished data) suggest C. subviolaceus is not conspecific with C. lacmus, despite being currently listed as a synonym of the latter.

ITS analyses see more by Dentinger et al. (unpublished) indicate that misapplied names resulted in polyphyletic phylogenies, and it will require considerable work to redetermine the vouchers, sequence types or authentic material and designate neotypes or epitypes to stabilize the nomenclature. The following new combinations are required so that sequences deposited in GenBank have the same (correct) generic name. Cuphophyllus acutoides (A.H. Sm & Hesler) Lodge, Matheny & Sánchez-García, comb. nov. MycoBank MB804126. Basionym: Hygrophorus selleck inhibitor acutoides A.H. Sm. & Hesler, Sydowia 8: 325 (1954). Type: USA: MICHIGAN, Mackinaw City, Sept. 16, 1950, H. Thiers and A.H. Smith 35847, MICH; paratype AHS 42960, MICH, ITS sequence GenBank HQ179684. Cuphophyllus acutoides

var. pallidus (A.H. Sm. & Hesler) Lodge, comb. nov. MycoBank MB804127. Basionym: Hygrophorus acutoides var. pallidus A.H. Sm. & Hesler, North American Species of Hygrophorus: 132 (1963). Type: USA, MICHIGAN, Milford, A.H. Smith 15421, Sept. 17, 1940, MICH. Comments Cuphophyllus acutoides var. acutoides and C. acutoides var. pallidus resemble the European C. fornicatus. The ITS sequences diverge more between the N. American and European CYTH4 collections (9.5 %) than between the two American taxa (5.2 %). As noted by Hesler and Smith (1963), H. acutoides var. pallidus differs from H. acutoides var. acutoides in having a pale pileus margin, https://www.selleckchem.com/products/gant61.html basidiospores that are smaller (mostly 6–8 × 4–5 vs. 7–8 × 5–6 μm), and a thin gelatinous coating on the pileipellis instead of an ixocutis 18–30 μm thick. Although the morphological differences together with ITS sequence divergence between H. acutoides var. acutoides (AHS 42960, paratype from Michigan, GenBank HQ179684, and PBM3897 from North Carolina) and H. acutoides var. pallidus (DJL06TN124 from Tennessee, GenBank KF291096) warrant recognition of the latter at species rank, we are not changing its status at this time.