For numerical judgments this finding is not surprising, and quite expected based on previous research

in the field (e.g., Gertner et al., 2009, Hubbard et al., 2009, Piazza et al., 2006 and Sagiv et al., 2006). However, for physical judgments (in which numerical value was irrelevant) it was novel and quite amazing to find that physical size solely was affected by spatial position. Specifically, when a large symbol was presented on the left or bottom and a small symbol Selleckchem Sirolimus was presented on the right or top (e.g., 3 3), synesthetes responded significantly less rapidly and less accurately compare to the opposite condition (e.g., 3 3) (Fig. 3, Table 2). Up to date, number-space synesthesia was viewed as a condition in which spatial

concert locations are consciously tied to symbolic numbers (e.g., 2) but not to other non-symbolic quantities (e.g., patterns of dots). However, what if number-space synesthesia is a much wider phenomenon that encompasses not only discrete, ordered, meaningful symbols (i.e., Arabic numbers) but also continuous, Selleckchem Epigenetic inhibitor non-symbolic magnitudes such as sizes, length, luminance, duration, etc.? Theories on perception and evaluation of sizes in numerical cognition (for review see Henik et al., 2012) strongly corroborate the above idea, in the sense that an ancient linkage between magnitudes and space exists and perhaps constitutes the neural and cognitive substrates for the evolution IKBKE of synesthetic number-space associations. Currently, we are conducting a few experiments in order to test which other aspects of the inducing stimulus might be involved in eliciting a sense of spatial location; is it merely the physical symbol (i.e., Arabic digit), its non-symbolic content (i.e., numerosity/magnitude) or both? We believe such studies will have

a significant contribution to the research on number-space synesthesia and to the field of numerical cognition in general. In contrast to the synesthetic explicit mental number form, the implicit numerical representation of non-synesthetes is assumed to be quite pliable and flexible (Bachthold et al., 1998, Cohen Kadosh et al., 2007a, Cohen Kadosh et al., 2007b, Gertner et al., 2009 and Schwarz and Keus, 2004). Thus, one does not expect number position to affect the SiCE for control participants. However, our findings show that it does, as was evident by the interaction between dimension congruency and number-line compatibility found in the physical judgments of both horizontal and vertical tasks. These interactions mean that the congruency effects in the number-line compatible condition where more pronounced than the congruency effects in the incompatible condition (see Table 2).