selleck compound CrossRef 6. Subrahmanyam S, Karim K, Piletsky SA: Computational approaches in the design of synthetic receptors. In Designing Receptors for the Next Generation of Biosensors. Edited by: Piletsky SA, Whitcombe MJ. www.selleckchem.com/products/Romidepsin-FK228.html Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2013:134–166. 7. Piletska EV, Guerreiro AR, Whitcombe MJ, Piletsky SA: Influence of the polymerization conditions on the performance
of molecularly imprinted polymers. Macromolecules 2009, 42:4921–4928.CrossRef 8. Leardi R: Experimental design in chemistry: a tutorial. Anal Chim Acta 2009, 652:161–172.CrossRef 9. Verma A, Hartonen K, Riekkola M: Optimisation of supercritical fluid extraction of indole alkaloids from Catharanthus roseus using experimental design methodology – comparison with other extraction techniques. Phytochem Anal 2008, 19:52–63.CrossRef 10. Lin J, Su M, Wang X, Qiu Y, Li H, Hao J, Yang H, Zhou M, Yan C, Jia W: Multiparametric analysis of amino acids and organic
acids in rat brain tissues using GC/MS. J Separation Science 2008, 31:2831–2838.CrossRef 11. Kempe H, Kempe M: Novel methods for the synthesis of molecularly imprinted polymer bead libraries. Macromolecules. Rapid Commun 2004, 25:315–320.CrossRef 12. Mijangos I, Villoslada FN, Guerreiro A, Piletska EV, Chianella I, Karim K, Turner APF, Piletsky SA: Influence of initiator and different polymerisation conditions on performance of molecularly imprinted polymers. Biosen Bioelectron PAK5 2006, 22:381–387.CrossRef 13. Nicholls IA, Andersson HS, Golker K, Henschel H, Karlsson BCG, Olsson GD, Wikman S: Rational design of biomimetic molecularly imprinted materials: Sapitinib clinical trial theoretical and computational strategies for guiding nanoscale structured polymer development.
Anal Bioanal Chem 2011, 400:1771–1786.CrossRef Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions KM carried out the experimental design and took part in the synthesis of MIP nanoparticles, KK participated in sequence alignment and drafted the manuscript. AG carried out the nanoMIP yield assay. AP participated in the preparation of template-derivatized glass beads and took part in synthesis of MIP nanoparticles. SP participated in the design of the study and performed the data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Background Surface plasmon-polariton (SPP) waves excited on a metal-dielectric interface allow the control and manipulation of light at nanoscale dimensions [1]. The propagation range of SPPs on a metal-dielectric interface is limited due to ohmic losses and scattering on random and intended interface irregularities [2–4]. Ohmic losses of free electrons depend on the SPP frequency range and the temperature of the structure and thus cannot be ultimately reduced. Therefore, further development of plasmonic devices is possible via reduction of scattering losses of SPPs.