42 Thirteen cases of stent occlusion were reported in the SEMS studies (ER of 7% per patient).31, 35 and 40 click here Only 1 case was reported with SEMS, although the stent was removed without incident.34 None of the studies reported this problem. One case of stent embedding was reported with SEMS, requiring placement of a second SEMS inside to

facilitate removal at a subsequent ERCP.31 A case of dilating balloon malpositioning during stent removal resulting in bile leak caused by a sudden rupture was reported; it was successfully treated with a PS.33 One case of self-contained perforation after sphincterotomy and 1 case of guidewire perforation were reported.6 One case of duodenal perforation was reported with NVP-BEZ235 cost MPS after LDLT.42 In the past decade, endoscopic therapy

has evolved to become the dominant strategy for treating ABSs, not only after OLT, but increasingly after LDLT. In this review, we summarize existing data on the safety and efficacy of the 2 major endoscopic therapeutic options (BD + MPSs and covered SEMSs) after OLT. Unfortunately, there are no randomized, controlled trials or nonrandomized studies that directly compare these 2 modalities. Covered SEMSs offer the advantages of longer stent patency (compared with a single PS) and easy removal. Both strategies have very high technical success rates and low adverse event rates in ABSs of OLT patients, despite the need for multiple ERCPs selleckchem per patient. With the notable exception of stent migration with SEMSs, the various adverse event rates reported in this review are low and similar to those reported in other studies.26, 45, 46, 47, 48 and 49 The MPS data presented here in OLT patients suggest that a longer stent

duration is associated with a greater chance of a successful outcome. In the 2 studies with an MPS duration of at least 12 months, the stricture resolution rate was 97% compared with the 78% in the 5 studies with a stent duration of less than 12 months. Late strictures are believed to be more fibrotic and inherently more difficult to dilate compared with early strictures, and therefore these strictures were likely managed more aggressively, with longer stent durations and/or more stents than used on the early strictures. Despite this possible selection bias for more difficult-to-treat strictures, stent duration longer than 12 months consistently achieved higher success rates than duration of less than 12 months. Furthermore, it makes intuitive sense that use of MPSs, with a greater maximal diameter, would result in higher stricture resolution rates. A retrospective study by Tabibian et al37 also demonstrated that a higher number of stents at initial ERCP and a higher total number of stents per patient (8 vs 3.5, P = .004) were predictors of stricture resolution. Although heterogeneity was seen in the stent protocols of the studies that we reviewed, all MPS studies except 1 had a stent exchange interval of 2 to 3 months.