[8]. The primary difference between the present study, demonstrating no improved performance, and past studies, demonstrating improved cycling performance, is likely the type of performance measure: sprint to

exhaustion at a constant power output in the present study as compared to interval-type performance at self-paced intensity in other studies. The lack of effect of creatine supplementation on performance in the present study is similar to the findings of Godly et al. [11] and Myburgh et al.[12], published only in abstract form. Godly et al. detected no greater improvement in performance in eight cyclists consuming creatine (7 grams/day for 5 days) compared to eight cyclists who consumed placebo. Both groups were tested before and after the 5-day blinded supplementation period. The well-trained AZ 628 solubility dmso cyclists SBI-0206965 sprinted 15 seconds every four kilometers of a 25 km time trial performed in the laboratory on their own bikes [11]. Myburgh et al. [12] also detected no difference in one-hour time trial after seven days of supplementation at 20 g/day. Thirteen cyclists were

tested before and after the supplementation period, with seven cyclists ingesting creatine and six ingesting Belnacasan placebo. These data conflict with past reports of positive benefits of creatine ingestion on endurance performance, and indicate that there is no consensus as to the effect of creatine supplementation on endurance performance

of continuous or variable-intensity cycling. The potential benefits of creatine supplementation include enhanced muscle creatine phosphate and muscle glycogen content, increased plasma volume, oxyclozanide and alterations in substrate selection and oxygen consumption. Although there were positive effects of this low-dose creatine compared to placebo supplementation with respect to resting muscle creatine phosphate and glycogen content, as well as increased plasma volume and reduced submaximal oxygen consumption during exercise, there was no greater improvement in sprint performance in the creatine than placebo group. There have been only two studies of creatine supplementation other than the present study reporting oxygen consumption during endurance exercise. Rico-Sanz and Marco [9] demonstrated an increased oxygen consumption following creatine ingestion when cyclists cycled at 90% of maximal power output. In contrast, we detected an interaction of treatment (creatine and placebo) and time (pre and post supplementation) for submaximal oxygen consumption near the end of the cycling bout in the present study, indicating that creatine supplementation results in lower submaximal oxygen consumption when cycling at 60% VO2peak. Differences in intensity and duration of the protocol may account for the discrepant findings of the current study and that of Rico-Sanz and Marco. Englehardt et al.